{"id":194,"date":"2008-11-21T05:30:00","date_gmt":"2008-11-21T05:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.tardisproject.net\/wdpress\/?p=194"},"modified":"2008-11-21T05:30:00","modified_gmt":"2008-11-21T05:30:00","slug":"ironmongery","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.morelikethisindustries.com\/tardisproject\/2008\/11\/21\/ironmongery\/","title":{"rendered":"&#8220;Ironmongery&#8221;?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><small>(<b>Note:<\/b> I originally posted this on my <a href=\"http:\/\/morganminstrel.livejournal.com\/\">personal blog<\/a>, but since it is about Doctor Who pre-production reports, it only makes sense to crosspost it here. &#8211;THE HISTORIAN)<\/small><br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nIn 1962, the new Head of Drama at the BBC commissioned a report on the idea of development of a science fiction program for the channel. The &#8220;Quartermass&#8221; series (beginning with 1953&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/The_Quatermass_Experiment\">&#8220;Quartermass Experiment&#8221;<\/a>) and <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/A_for_Andromeda\">&#8220;A for Andromeda&#8221;<\/a> serial (1961) had led to the belief that a regular SF TV series might be possible. <\/p>\n<p>Well, we all know where the report led, but most people have never actually read the thing. Now we can; to celebrate Doctor Who&#8217;s 45th anniversary, the BBC Archive has put a bunch of original documents detailing the program&#8217;s development online. I&#8217;ve read the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bbc.co.uk\/archive\/doctorwho\/dr6400_1.shtml?doc=6400\">original report<\/a> and it&#8217;s a fascinating &#8220;outsider&#8217;s&#8221; look at SF in 1962 and why it might or might not be popular with the public at large. Although talking about the British public in general, I think the general ideas were probably applicable to a US television audience as well, especially in the &#8220;general audience will have to catch up with science fiction, rather than vice versa.&#8221; To be honest, reading this and the obvious work done to lay the groundwork for what would become Doctor Who, I think I might understand a little more about why it ran (essentially) uninterrupted for 23 years, watched by a wide variety of people, whereas the original Star Trek lasted for 2 for a general audience, then got a third season thanks to die-hard fans and stayed a cult\/kids show until the late &#8217;70s. Not to say one is any more quality than the other, but the planning and production of both were <i>vastly<\/i> different. Doctor Who seems to have been quite consciously developed as &#8220;bringing the people to SF,&#8221; whereas Trek was certainly &#8220;bringing SF to the people.&#8221; DW brought the audience to them, ST had to wait for the general audience to catch up with it.<\/p>\n<p>Anyway, I found it really interesting. Anyone else?<\/p>\n<p><small>I do make a distinction between TV and radio here; it&#8217;s true that radio shows like &#8220;X Minus One&#8221; had been moderately successful at adapting SF stories, but they used sound rather than visuals which I think makes a big difference. I don&#8217;t know; I feel like there must be a distinction there, but I&#8217;m finding it hard to articulate. Again, anyone else?<\/small><\/p>\n<p>Additional: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bbc.co.uk\/archive\/doctorwho\/dr6401_1.shtml?doc=6401\">Here&#8217;s the follow-up report<\/a> identifying possible sources of adaptation (or ideas) for SF TV series. Notice which one has been highlighted by someone receiving the report; I had no idea the seed of Doctor Who came from a Poul Anderson novel! I should probably read that at some point&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>(Note: I originally posted this on my personal blog, but since it is about Doctor Who pre-production reports, it only makes sense to crosspost it here. &#8211;THE HISTORIAN)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-194","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.morelikethisindustries.com\/tardisproject\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/194","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.morelikethisindustries.com\/tardisproject\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.morelikethisindustries.com\/tardisproject\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.morelikethisindustries.com\/tardisproject\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.morelikethisindustries.com\/tardisproject\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=194"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.morelikethisindustries.com\/tardisproject\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/194\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.morelikethisindustries.com\/tardisproject\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=194"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.morelikethisindustries.com\/tardisproject\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=194"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.morelikethisindustries.com\/tardisproject\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=194"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}